07-20-2019, 11:47 AM.bojo Wrote:

07-20-2019, 11:41 AMTomen Wrote: Personally dislike the idea of being able to pay money so you don't have to do PT's but if the money is tight for the SHL operation costs I wouldn't mind it but only as a last resort thing.

If we introduce donations with a benefit I think being able to buy SHL money for IRL money should be fine (rip 701). But that should also be capped to some extend. People will say that will limit media but I hope this would just improve the quality of the average SHL media instead of having poor quality cash grab articles.

I feel like buying money is worse because it's makes the already inflated ecosystem even more pointless when it comes to contracts. Plus ultimately it's still the same idea as PTs for about the same amount of points.

That was my first thought too but imo Contracts won't really be effected that much by it. Most SHL players are already on minimum contracts or 1m above their contract minimum.
BUF has no SHL roster player that gets paid more than 2m of their TPE minimum
CGY has Vrzala,Batsbak,Choybuk,
CHI has Akmenlauts,Kennedy, CC2
HAM has Dicks
EDM has Knouse
LAP has Clijsters
MAN has Crawfling,Scoop,Rove
NEW has Bathory,Chiclets,Ulrich,Christansen
MIN has Emond,Watson,Nova
TOR has McFadden,Rhys,Vakarian
WKP has Kirkby,
WPG has Leblanc,Scarn,Blunt

Which is 26/256 players ( a team has usually 1 goalie, 6 defenders, 9 forwards) in the league. McFadden and Rhys only fall in that criteria coz they are on inactive contracts. So essentially that just less than 10% of the league which is pretty negligible imo.

Money compared to PT's doesn't have a deadline and can be generated through various means and there is cap on how much TPE is there around. Money on the other hand has no cap and no deadlines so to speak compared to PT's which makes imo SHL money for donation less valueable than PT passes for donations.