02-27-2019, 10:58 AM.bojo Wrote:

02-27-2019, 10:52 AMArGarBarGar Wrote: Assuming every semi-active hits the cap or can hit the cap.

10 is essentially the minimum disparity between actives and semi-actives (compared to what would be 0). If a semi-active only earns 35 out of the 40 capped TPE then that gets up to 15 (which would be compared to 5).

Again, if we actually want to make the cap matter then why would we not just drop it back down to 35? Or increase the number of PT opportunities?

Abolishing it entirely ignores the entire reason why we even had it.

it's not about if the semi can hit the cap. the difference is still 10 tpe for the person who can go above 40. the active player would make 1500 instead of 1400 (just an example) after 10 seasons. the semi is still making the same progress he normally would. the only difference is that the active player can fight regression a little better.

which, would make even more sense if this is tied together with the regression ideas people have been throwing around.

You are assuming all semi-actives hit the cap, though.

Also how robust do we have to make regression before people are satisfied? Not to mention all-time records will be all but impossible to hit if we continue to do that.

It seems all these suggestions are being made without any recognition of everything else that is involved in the league. We did that the first time we tweaked regression recently, we did that with the new update scale, and I feel like we are going to be doing that with these suggestions now.