+- Simulation Hockey League (https://archive.simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Public Archives (https://archive.simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=724)
+--- Forum: Public Archives (https://archive.simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=727)
+--- Thread: Draft Pick Tracker (/showthread.php?tid=942)
- Possum Queen - 05-28-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Storm@May 28 2015, 09:29 PMo:-)
(and to destroy their organization from the inside, looking at you Tanner. :ph34r: )
- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 05-28-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Bowhuntr11@May 28 2015, 08:32 PMat pick 28 or 29, theres no reason not to take him.
Ha, I actually would prefer people to waste their picks for the next 2 seasons on him, and then get him on the 3rd draft, and he would be almost ready by then TPE wise... :lol:
That would actually be the ideal situation. :lol:
this draft isn't active enough where you're gonna get a player at that spot.
id take him and if NEW doesn't think he is worth giving up a 2nd for, then oh well, not like i'm missing out on a player anyways.
- EuroCap - 05-28-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Storm@May 28 2015, 08:29 PMWelcome to Minny!
Not you. >:D<
Anyways, if someone chooses to pick me so be it, they just better expect me to not sign.
(and to destroy their organization from the inside, looking at you Tanner. :ph34r: )
) 
- Schultzy - 05-28-2015
If I was a GM and he was the best player available at my pick, I'd take him. Worse case I ransom him back to NEW. Best case, I convince him my team is better than NEW. Either way it's not a bad strategy and it will certainly make for an exciting story line to this year's Draft.
- .bojo - 05-28-2015
Or he could just not sign a deal and go back into the draft for next season
- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 05-28-2015
I wouldnt take him if there are other prospects worth taking, but at 28 or 29, why not?
- Mac - 05-28-2015
Cause smart gms don't waste picks? I have 33 actives listed, it'd be
smarter to draft someone with a chance of staying
- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 05-28-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Mac@May 28 2015, 09:01 PMit's worth taking Storm than taking a semi-active with 190 TPE.
Cause smart gms don't waste picks? I have 33 actives listed, it'd be
smarter to draft someone with a chance of staying
If NEW doesnt think Storm is worth a 2nd round pick (which is where Co-GMs are auto'd) then thats fine…good luck trying to get him in the 3rd round in S25
- storm - 05-28-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Bojo@May 28 2015, 08:56 PM
Or he could just not sign a deal and go back into the draft for next season
- xDParK - 05-28-2015
I'd take my pal Storm 1st overall
- Nike - 05-28-2015
Always love when people try and circumvent the draft...
Not that this situation is that entirely, but if you want him...pick him. Fuck, I had to trade for the 1st overall selection to draft myself a few seasons ago. While I'd never want to see a GM face that same difficulty, it's just how the league works when you haven't hit the tenure expectations yet.
Have nothing against Storm or
btw, just my two c ents
- Nike - 05-28-2015
Always love when people try and circumvent the draft...
Not that this situation is that entirely, but if you want him...pick him. Fuck, I had to trade for the 1st overall selection to draft myself a few seasons ago. While I'd never want to see a GM face that same difficulty, it's just how the league works when you haven't hit the tenure expectations yet.
Have nothing against Storm or
btw, just my two c ents
- Underoath10 - 05-28-2015
This has practically become the same argument we had before about ArGarBarGar and his wife/significant other. Things will work themselves out in the end. They always do.
- Underoath10 - 05-28-2015
This has practically become the same argument we had before about ArGarBarGar and his wife/significant other. Things will work themselves out in the end. They always do.
- r1c3bowl22 - 05-28-2015
I wanna draft myself....