02-27-2019, 12:16 PMDaco Wrote:

02-27-2019, 12:01 PMSwegButthole Wrote: That doesnt limit the players personal progression tho, only the teams, and we already have that but people are idiots and doesnt ask for money so we get some OP teams. Only way to fix that would be to make money harder to come by, which im totally against because it'd hurt the small amount of media we already have. Sure you could make the media stuff be a TPE reward instead of money maybe, idk.

But luckily the majority so far seem to want the cap gonezo

Merging uncapped into a cap that is larger like 100 keeps media coming but balances out the people who may not have 18mil per season to max. Otrebor had a good explanation I'm not sure if he posted it yet here.  This let's the top tier players build a pretty big notch between them and midtier guys while keeping from those 2000 tpe extreme disparities. The numbers were just estimated I'm at work but I think the premise is good.


Essentially making the cap 33% higher than the average players tpe gained per season is my succinct summary there. If average persons combined capped and uncapped total tpe avg gain per season is 100, cap becomes 133 so the max players are creating a compounding gap over the mid tier season over season making them 200 points higher than their average peer in 6 seasons. That can be tuned accordingly.

Yeah I posted what we spoke about. It's on the 5th page.

http://simulationhockey.com/showthread.p...pid2587990